Prompting patterns

Task:
Source:
Context:
Output:
Constraints:
Review points:

Task: Review this validation protocol.
Source: Attached DOCX and the protocol Workspace.
Context: Stage 2 PPQ for a fill-finish process.
Output: A table with section, gap, why it matters, source support, and SME question.
Constraints: Preserve requirement IDs. Do not invent acceptance criteria.
Review points: Ask me before creating a CoDraft.

Use the selected sources only. Separate source-backed facts, assumptions, unsupported claims, missing evidence, and SME questions. Cite or name the source for each fact where possible.

Extract the relevant information into a table with columns for source, section, finding, impact, assumption, and follow-up question.

Draft in neutral language. Separate observations from conclusions. Flag unsupported statements instead of making them sound certain.

Rewrite this for quality review. Keep factual claims tied to sources, avoid causal language unless supported, and list open questions after the paragraph.

Use Plan Mode. Propose the steps first. Include source review, gap identification, artifact creation, and human review points. Do not execute until I approve the plan.

Create a CoDraft outline from these sources. Include headings, source map, missing evidence, SME questions, and placeholders where conclusions need review.

Create a CoDraft template for a deviation report. Include placeholders for deviation ID, product, batch, event date, immediate actions, evidence reviewed, root cause assessment, CAPA link, and approval notes.

Analyze this CoSheet. Profile the data, find missing values, outliers, duplicate IDs, inconsistent units, and columns that need formulas. Suggest one pivot table and one chart.

Create a flowchart for the CAPA effectiveness check process. Include trigger, evidence review, sampling decision, effectiveness conclusion, QA review, and follow-up actions.

Generate a clean technical illustration for internal training. Show a quality team reviewing a deviation timeline and source documents. Avoid logos, patient data, and readable document text.

Review this visual before I use it. List assumptions, source gaps, labels that need checking, and details an SME should confirm.

Create a formula for Status using Result, Lower Limit, and Upper Limit. Mark Fail when Result is outside limits, Review when a limit is missing, and Pass otherwise. Show the formula before applying it.

Use this CoMeeting to create a follow-up table with decision, action item, owner, due date, unresolved question, source transcript section, and related Workspace file to check.

Turn this SME interview into a CoDraft memo. Separate observed facts, SME opinion, assumptions, decisions, and evidence needed.

Build an Orchestration for batch record review. First propose required inputs, optional inputs, agents, tasks, source checks, output format, and human review points. Do not create it until I approve the design.

Run the CAPA effectiveness Orchestration using this Workspace and CoSheet. Ask me for missing inputs before starting, and pause before drafting the final conclusion.

Compare these sources. Return a table with claim, source A position, source B position, difference, practical impact, and question for internal review.

Based on the sources and gaps, recommend the next Sofie workflow. Tell me whether to use chat, CoDraft, CoSheet, CoMeeting, Workspace, or Orchestrate, and explain the first three steps.

Analyze these three files for protocol gaps. Return a table first. Ask me before creating or saving any artifact.